build-from-branch into the primary archive
Steve Langasek
steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Mon Mar 7 21:56:19 UTC 2011
[sorry for the late reply]
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:01:10AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >For that matter, if DEBCHANGE_RELEASE_HEURISTIC=changelog were the default,
> >there would be an explicit "mark this ready for upload" step that typically
> >consists of 'dch -r && debcommit -r', which creates exactly the same tag as
> >'bzr mark-uploaded'.
> FWIW, 'dch -r && debcommit -r' is a bit of black magic that doesn't seem
> well-covered in the documentation. Or, perhaps more accurately, it wasn't
> stressed enough to make it onto my radar before this thread.
> Maybe it would be more discoverable as 'bzr release' instead of 'bzr
> mark-upload' or 'dch -r && debcommit -r'?
Maybe 'bzr debrelease', to avoid polluting the namespace too much?
This should be implemented on top of 'dch' and support the -D option to
specify an upload target; we definitely shouldn't have bzr-builddeb encoding
its own notion of the default upload target, it's bad enough to have *one*
package that doesn't get updated for this as part of the release. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20110307/ad5622fd/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list