Patch pilot Report 2011-06-10

Martin Pitt martin.pitt at
Sat Jun 11 10:38:54 UTC 2011

Benjamin Drung [2011-06-11  9:16 +0200]:
> Am Freitag, den 10.06.2011, 13:09 +0200 schrieb Didier Roche:
> > Those issues where we loose contributor and our time just for ensuring
> > and reporting commits in the right branch make me think that for desktop
> > team branch (as most of them are in
> > ~ubuntu-desktop/<package_name>/ubuntu, we should maybe point the
> > canonical branch (lp:ubuntu/<pakage_name>) to them? Same with compiz
> > which is under ~compiz?
> Yes, please use lp:ubuntu/<package_name>.

Last time I talked to James, he said that the lp:ubuntu/ branches
should only be full-source ones, not the debian/ only branches that
the desktop team uses in their branches.

I'd actually prefer if the lp:ubuntu/<branch> would not be created in
the first place for packages which already have Vcs-Bzr: pointing to

Martin Pitt                        |
Ubuntu Developer (  | Debian Developer  (
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list