DMB: Proposal for a different review process

[Mackenzie Morgan]

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Scott Moser <smoser at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> 2011-06-20 [1] ended in a discussion about "Whats a Quorum"
> 2011-02-14 [2] was postponed, maybe that is what I had seen. I admit to
>   possibly getting lost trying to quickly scan the logs.

#1 had quorum just dandy. The applicant didn't get enough votes.
Period.  When this occurs, we give the applicant a second chance via
the mailing list to make up the votes they are missing.  I recently
learned that NOT all the other boards do this. This is apparently just
the DMB being nice about it.
#2 was the old DMB announcing who won the election for the new DMB,
attempting to vote on an application, and the applicant being a
no-show.  Whether Daviey should apply for Core Dev and MOTU separately
was also discussed.  Quorum was achieved (persia, cjwatson, bdrung,
soren).

> --
> [1] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/20/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t20:07
> [2] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/02/14/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t12:15

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan