DMB: Proposal for a different review process
macoafi at gmail.com
Wed Aug 3 20:15:24 UTC 2011
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan <macoafi at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Scott Moser <smoser at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> 2011-06-20  ended in a discussion about "Whats a Quorum"
>> 2011-02-14  was postponed, maybe that is what I had seen. I admit to
>> possibly getting lost trying to quickly scan the logs.
> #1 had quorum just dandy. The applicant didn't get enough votes.
> Period. When this occurs, we give the applicant a second chance via
> the mailing list to make up the votes they are missing. I recently
> learned that NOT all the other boards do this. This is apparently just
> the DMB being nice about it.
> #2 was the old DMB announcing who won the election for the new DMB,
> attempting to vote on an application, and the applicant being a
> no-show. Whether Daviey should apply for Core Dev and MOTU separately
> was also discussed. Quorum was achieved (persia, cjwatson, bdrung,
>>  http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/20/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t20:07
>>  http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/02/14/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t12:15
> Mackenzie Morgan
Linux User #432169
ACM Member #3445683
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com <-my blog of Ubuntu stuff
More information about the ubuntu-devel