brainstorming for the UDS-N session list
kirkland at ubuntu.com
Wed Sep 29 17:11:59 BST 2010
Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> wrote:
> I would like to see some work on the traditional server boot experience. It
> regressed significantly in Lucid and has gotten some improvement in Maverick,
> but I don't think it's had a good looking over by server admins. For server
> admins a logo is not what it beautiful. Information about what's going on
> with their system is what tends to delight them. Myself, if I'm booting a
> server where I can see the boot it's for trouble shooting and so I like it to
> be a bit chatty. What is "good" is in many respects the opposite of what
> makes a good desktop boot.
Improved desktop boot experience has seriously impacted the usability
and function of traditional Ubuntu Server and Cloud installations.
To me, "elegance", in a server boot, is compromised of meaningful
log/info/warning/error messages, coupled with a convenient way to drop
to a prompt (be it grub, initramfs, or the system shell), as soon as
needed. We've lost (or heavily masked) those server boot requirements
over the last few releases.
More information about the ubuntu-devel