brainstorming for the UDS-N session list
Jamie Strandboge
jamie at canonical.com
Wed Sep 29 15:28:46 BST 2010
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:21 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I would like to see some work on the traditional server boot experience. It
> regressed significantly in Lucid and has gotten some improvement in Maverick,
> but I don't think it's had a good looking over by server admins. For server
> admins a logo is not what it beautiful. Information about what's going on
> with their system is what tends to delight them. Myself, if I'm booting a
> server where I can see the boot it's for trouble shooting and so I like it to
> be a bit chatty. What is "good" is in many respects the opposite of what
> makes a good desktop boot.
Yes! +1
--
Jamie Strandboge | http://www.canonical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20100929/16c8592f/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list