brainstorming for the UDS-N session list

Jamie Strandboge jamie at canonical.com
Wed Sep 29 15:28:46 BST 2010


On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:21 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I would like to see some work on the traditional server boot experience.  It 
> regressed significantly in Lucid and has gotten some improvement in Maverick, 
> but I don't think it's had a good looking over by server admins.  For server 
> admins a logo is not what it beautiful.  Information about what's going on 
> with their system is what tends to delight them.  Myself, if I'm booting a 
> server where I can see the boot it's for trouble shooting and so I like it to 
> be a bit chatty.  What is "good" is in many respects the opposite of what 
> makes a good desktop boot.

Yes! +1

-- 
Jamie Strandboge             | http://www.canonical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20100929/16c8592f/attachment.pgp 


More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list