Idea: review + massive sync of Debian changes not involving new upstream versions?
lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net
Thu Mar 18 07:46:51 GMT 2010
On 17/03/10 at 23:36 +0000, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 17 March 2010 18:43, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 5 lines summary:
> > For universe packages that don't have anybody looking at them, I
> > propose that, instead of letting them rot after Debian Import Freeze,
> > we instead review the Debian changes that don't introduce new upstream
> > versions, and continue to sync them (manually) to Ubuntu to get all
> > the bug fixes that happen in Debian.
> +1 is criteria for review is new build dependencies are satisfiable.
> Test success build?
Of course, if the packages adds new build dependencies, the reviewer
should try to make sure that the package can still build fine in Ubuntu.
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
More information about the ubuntu-devel