kvm-ok: looking for a better home
apw at canonical.com
Tue Mar 16 09:38:04 GMT 2010
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:31:57AM -0600, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Martin Pitt <martin.pitt at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > Dustin Kirkland [2010-03-05 18:26 -0600]:
> >> Thus, for Lucid, I'd really like to find a better home for kvm-ok.
> > I like linux-tools best; if that's going to land in lucid? procps also
> > sounds okay to me.
> I was leaning toward procps, as Kees has agreed to take this there.
> I suppose I should ask Andy, though, if he's working on linux-tools...
> Andy, what do you think? Will linux-tools make Lucid? Will it be
> available basically on all Ubuntu desktop and server installs?
This ended up as an explicit Seed for developers I believe. So I
suspect that its not guarenteed to be everywhere. The kernel turns out
to be a poor place to have complex dependancies testing wise.
More information about the ubuntu-devel