Analysis of 10 years of bugzilla.mozilla.org

[Martin Pitt]

Ted Gould [2010-01-26 16:40 -0600]:
> I'm going to guess now, or at least not in the way that you expect.  And
> one of the reason there is apport.  I'll tend to file bugs that then get
> labeled as duplicates by apport, but I couldn't have made that decision
> myself so I filled them anyway.

This only applies to crashes, though, which are already special in a
way that they are uniform, can be clearly identified and filtered by
tag or description, and get reported/duplicated automatically.

I think the real bug reports are a much harder problem to tackle;
obviously we don't have a magic way to auto-dupe bugs. (Patches
appreciated, of course! :-) )

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20100127/9c901377/attachment.pgp