motu-release
Stefan Potyra
stefan.potyra at informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Thu Feb 18 12:02:43 GMT 2010
Hi,
Am Thursday 18 February 2010 12:21:34 schrieb Steve Langasek:
[..]
>
> Ack; freeze announcement sent out with the status quo.
Thanks!
>
> Regarding the team unification, is there an expectation that the two-vote
> approach will continue? I don't have a strong preference between the
> ubuntu-release and motu-release approaches, but I think it would be strange
> to be applying different procedures for different archive sections - or to
> different members of the team! - so we should probably pick one...
Definitely makes sense. I don't have a strong preference over the exact
procedure as well. How did ubuntu-release handle FFe's so far? I assume the
worklist is the list of subscribed bugs? Do you also use the +nominations
page?
Cheers,
Stefan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20100218/f317c7cc/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list