Request For Candidates: Application Review Board

[Shane Fagan]

Well we could limit it to quickly if someone made templates for C# (and
ruby if someone is interested in that). Im making a vala template at the
moment but it wont be fully done till next release id say but ill more
than likely have something usable for Maverick. 

Even though im a Java developer I don't think there will be many apps
submitted that will be written in it and my guess right now is that
there will be none. The reason is that java isn't the easiest thing to
write good desktop apps in. Limewire is the only one I can think of that
doesn't look horrible.

--fagan

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:14 +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:57:27AM +0100, Paul Sladen wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > > we will drop the barrier for app developers, not to concentrate on
> > > package building
> > 
> > My understanding is that with Quickly, it is already a one-click process to
> > upload to a PPA.  The obstacle to be overcome is now how to get the contents
> > of that PPA reviewed and added the main distribution, with another click.
> 
> Yes...but why should someone use Quickly alone?
> 
> Think about all the new nifty c# developer fraction...
> Java app developer etc.
> 
> I think we shouldn't restrict app devs to quickly :)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> \sh