Review: Syncing from testing a success?

[Daniel Hahler]

On Thursday 08 April 2010 22:45:19 Benjamin Drung wrote:

> Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2010, 13:38 -0700 schrieb Kees Cook:
> > My general opinion is that for _development_ we should return to
> > unstable, and during _stabilization_ we could sync from testing.  I've
> > long suspected that the auto-sync stops much too early.  If we auto-sync
> > from unstable until the current cut-off, and then auto-sync from testing
> > for a while after that, I think we'll get the best of both worlds.
> 
> +1

Yes, +1


Side note: "grab-merge" / merges.ubuntu.com should support both sources.
"grab-merge" would default to either testing (more "stable"), the current 
source (unstable during development, testing afterwards => default needs to 
change/upload), or "unstable" (since you are grabbing a merge, it is more 
likely that it's from unstable - preferred and what is missing currently at 
all).


Cheers,
Daniel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20100409/390c7bfb/attachment.pgp