Review: Syncing from testing a success?

Daniel Hahler ubuntu+lists at
Fri Apr 9 19:10:21 BST 2010

On Thursday 08 April 2010 22:45:19 Benjamin Drung wrote:

> Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2010, 13:38 -0700 schrieb Kees Cook:
> > My general opinion is that for _development_ we should return to
> > unstable, and during _stabilization_ we could sync from testing.  I've
> > long suspected that the auto-sync stops much too early.  If we auto-sync
> > from unstable until the current cut-off, and then auto-sync from testing
> > for a while after that, I think we'll get the best of both worlds.
> +1

Yes, +1

Side note: "grab-merge" / should support both sources.
"grab-merge" would default to either testing (more "stable"), the current 
source (unstable during development, testing afterwards => default needs to 
change/upload), or "unstable" (since you are grabbing a merge, it is more 
likely that it's from unstable - preferred and what is missing currently at 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : 

More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list