Proposed removal of unbuildable binaries from lucid (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidPlatformSupportableBinaries)

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:33:07AM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> hm, looks like we're stuck in a fortran transition? Anyone who'd like to 
> volunteer to find out more about that?

Thanks for working on this, Stefan!

> > The hurd and debtags-edit build-deps are resolved in unstable, so it looks
> > like a sync / merge will take care of us.  sdlmame is not in Debian - does
> > someone want to take responsibility for this package?

hurd has been resolved by a package removal; debtags has been resolved by a
QA upload + sync.

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 07:30:26AM +0200, Fabrice Coutadeur wrote:

> Steve Langasek escribió:
> > The hurd and debtags-edit build-deps are resolved in unstable, so it looks
> > like a sync / merge will take care of us.  sdlmame is not in Debian - does
> > someone want to take responsibility for this package?

> I sponsored the 2 latest upload. I'll check with Cesare the build status
> with a higher version of gcc.

And this one appears to be in progress, so not treating it as a blocker.

Seeing no other objections, the identified binaries are now being removed.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org