20090929.2 UEC install test
Dustin Kirkland
kirkland at canonical.com
Thu Oct 1 01:52:27 BST 2009
Thierry-
I spent today testing Eucalyptus on the beta candidate.
I installed with the current beta candidate, which includes
eucalyptus_1.6~bzr854-0ubuntu12. I confirmed that walrus registration
worked, and sc and cc registration was broken.
At this point, I upgraded both the CC and NC machines to the latest
eucalyptus in the archive, the one that includes the fixes I uploaded
last night, eucalyptus_1.6~bzr854-0ubuntu13.
Immediately upon upgrade, all 3 components successfully registered.
For good measure, I rebooted the system at this time. Upon reboot,
all components were again registered successfully. The web interface
correctly reflected the setup. I then registered the NC properly,
without incident. The NC immediately started polling. I could run
euca-describe-availability-zones and see my cloud availability.
Next, I started the extremely lengthy task of registering and running
images. This part takes a very, very long time. 1-2 hours, to be
honest. I followed (and updated) the steps at:
* http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/ServerEConfig
I was able to bundle, register, and upload the image. I also
submitted the run job, and it immediately went into the pending state.
Monitoring the NC, I watched as 10GB's were transferred over the
network, and then Eucalyptus dd'd a new image, and eventually the
image made it to the running state.
Once it was in the running state, I was able to obtain the boot
console messages with euca-get-console-output. The image came up, but
was having networking issues. You can view the console log attached
to this bug:
* https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/439288
At this point, I strongly believe that the
eucalyptus_1.6~bzr854-0ubuntu13 upload is better than the -0ubuntu12
upload. I don't think that it regresses the state of the package, and
it does fix several bugs. We're still a ways from a complete, working
UEC, but we're getting there. I believe that -0ubuntu13 solves the
majority of the registration issues, and I am very much able to run
instances with that version.
I don't particularly care whether -0ubuntu13 makes it on the beta ISO,
but I definitely don't think it should be reverted from the archive.
:-Dustin
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list