powernowd vs. ondemand governor
Dustin Kirkland
kirkland at ubuntu.com
Mon Feb 16 17:25:48 GMT 2009
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Matt Zimmerman <mdz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> We currently ship powernowd in the desktop seed, its main purpose being to
> load cpufreq modules set up the kernel's CPU frequency scaling governor. If
> (and only if) that fails, it starts up powernowd instead. I'm not sure on
> which platforms that's still needed, if any.
>
> Is this still an appropriate default? Aren't the necessary modules loaded
> automatically now? Would it be a better idea to set the default to ondemand
> in the kernel and drop powernowd altogether?
Just last week, I added powernowd to the server seed for these reasons
(to load the cpufreq modules and set the governor to 'on-demand' by
default).
If there is a simpler mechanism for accomplishing this (eg, set that
default in the kernel), we could drop the powernowd package from the
server seed as well.
:-Dustin
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list