List of packages that FTBFS in lucid
Lucas Nussbaum
lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net
Tue Dec 22 19:08:31 GMT 2009
On 22/12/09 at 09:38 +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 04:59:40PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Similarly to the archive rebuilds I do for Debian, I've set up the
> > required infrastructure to do archive rebuilds for Ubuntu. The packages
> > are rebuild inside up-to-date and minimal lucid chroots.
>
> Interesting, thank you for your efforts on this. I have already spotted
> a package which should have been purged using this list. I was checking
> the kernel package and see the following, 32bit build success and 64bit
> failure:
>
> linux 2.6.32-7.10 ... OK Failed [UNKNOWN] XXX
>
> I am assuming the tooling has detected an error, but is unable to
> pinpoint it? Do you have any hints as to how I might locate the
> apparent failure?
Arg, you uncovered a bug. At some point, the list of failures for i386
and amd64 were exchanged. The amd64 build succeeded, but not the i386
one.
The i386 is failing with:
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/x86/Kconfig
*** Error during update of the kernel configuration.
make[6]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 1
make[5]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 2
> The only odd thing I see in the 64bit build log is the following, which
> I am not expecting the package to be using?
>
> [15872.690025] pnmtopng[20617]: segfault at 0 ip 55661960 sp ff857630 error 4 in libc-2.10.1.so[55602000+142000]
Yes, that might be because of a previous build on the same node, or a
concurrent build. But this should not affect the current build.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list