"Fix Released" state for changelog closed bugs

Matt Zimmerman mdz at ubuntu.com
Wed Apr 8 17:57:08 BST 2009


On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:30:47PM +0100, Matthew East wrote:
> I've seen a little bit of confusion in the bug tracker about the
> status of bugs which are marked as "Fix Released" after a package
> upload has specified the bug number in a changelog.
> 
> Such bugs are marked as "released" immediately upon the source package
> upload being completed, but before the package has been built or
> published, even though a fix for the bug is not available to users.
> The gap can take hours, and in the case where a package does not build
> correctly, days.
> 
> The result can be confusion (e.g.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/353117/comments/4)
> and/or duplicate bug reports, because bugs marked "fix released" are
> excluded from bug search results. (A related Launchpad bug is here:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/malone/+bug/163694.)
> 
> In my view fixes for such bugs are not genuinely released until binary
> packages for all officially supported architectures have been
> published on the official Ubuntu mirror.
> 
> Do people disagree with that? If not, are there other practical
> reasons why we wouldn't apply this principle? I can see that it would
> be inconvenient for developers to have to check when a package is
> published before they can manually touch bugs, but now that closing
> bugs automatically by changelog is so easy and widespread, I don't
> know whether that is a genuine concern anymore.

I think there's another Launchpad bug somewhere which says that the bug
closure should happen when the package has been built and published.  I
think that is a reasonable solution to the confusion.

-- 
 - mdz



More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list