Ubuntu Policy: prefixes for multiples of units
neal at bcn.boulder.co.us
Wed Sep 24 21:10:23 BST 2008
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:57:51PM -0600, Neal McBurnett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:28:36PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > I'm quite happy to agree on using Giga consistently to mean 1x10^9,
> > however I was mindful of your comment that RAM manufacturers (and
> > standards!) still build in powers of two.
> > I'm not sure how desirable or worrying it is for an Ubuntu machine to
> > report 2.1GB of RAM when a user just bought 2GB, and it quite clearly
> > said 2GB on the box.
> I'm just saying it should be reported as 2 GiB, as the majority of
> standards bodies suggest. Reporting 2.1 GB is a bug. Whether to wait
> for upstream to fix the bug, or to fix it and carry a diff, will
> depend on various other things.
Sorry - I got twisted up there while rephrasing and retyping things.
The *box* should not say 2 GB - that is a bug, but I don't usually
know where to report it :)
I'd suggest software would want to report it as 2 GiB. Saying 2.1 GB
will probably confuse users more than saying 2 GiB, and thus may be a
bug, though the context could make a big difference in all that.
Neal McBurnett http://mcburnett.org/neal/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20080924/feca3a08/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel