Alternative Boot Loaders

Bryan Haskins ryuzaki90 at gmail.com
Mon May 5 23:50:58 BST 2008


My Take:
Some people, for whatever reason still prefer LILO, most don't care and just
use the default, GrUB. It's a very small customization some users like. It's
not like boot loaders eat a lot of physical space on the disc or anything.

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Matt Darcy <ubuntu.lists at projecthugo.co.uk>
wrote:

> Developers,
>
> I'm trying to establish the reasoning behind including alternative boot
> loaders such as lilo on the ubuntu alternative and server cds ?
>
> Was this a technical decision ?
> Was this a policy decision ?
>
> could someone please explain the decision and the reasons behind it.
>
> thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20080505/f87c4281/attachment.htm 


More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list