Ubuntu Policy Manual
cjwatson at ubuntu.com
Sun Aug 24 15:19:54 BST 2008
As per the attached mail, I've uploaded a version of the Debian Policy
Manual customised for Ubuntu. You can see the text here as well as in
I've also uploaded a Bazaar import of the Debian master branch (thanks
to bzr-fastimport) and a Bazaar branch corresponding to this Ubuntu
upload to Launchpad. The latter is owned by ubuntu-core-dev:
There are undoubtedly gaps in this, and in particular there are some
items from the UDS discussion
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UDS-Intrepid/Report/Platform) that I haven't
yet captured. I think it should be a good start, though.
As discussed at UDS, I suggest that we establish a lightweight process
for making substantive policy changes. The rough consensus at UDS was as
* Developer posts proposed change (in prose or as a diff) to
* Discussion thread on ubuntu-devel to establish wording of change
* If general consensus is achieved, any core developer other than the
original proposer may apply the change (this is to avoid one-man
changes to policy)
Maybe the last point is too strict, and we can just require some number
of seconds before committing. What do people think? Also,
non-substantive changes (trivial formatting adjustments, typos, package
maintenance, etc.) should obviously be allowed without process.
I also just realised that at UDS people thought this should be called
ubuntu-policy and the pristine debian-policy should be retained in the
archive for reference. Oops. Is this important to try to revert somehow?
We could just refer people to the original by URL.
Colin Watson [cjwatson at ubuntu.com]
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Ubuntu Installer <archive at ubuntu.com>
Subject: Accepted: debian-policy 22.214.171.124ubuntu1 (source)
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:30:16 -0000
More information about the ubuntu-devel