[Bug 245594] Re: Please add binNMU capabilities to Soyuz
stefan.potyra at informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Tue Aug 5 12:54:37 BST 2008
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 13:26:33 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:02:39 +0200 Stefan Potyra
> <stefan.potyra at informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> >On Tuesday 05 August 2008 12:28:55 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> Could you please give a rationale why we don't want binNMUs in ubuntu,
> >> but require sourceful uploads? I was under the impression that we don't
> >> want this because there was no infrastructure for this. Now the request
> >> for adding this is rejected on the grounds that policy forbids this. I
> >> have the feeling we are turning in circles here, so could someone please
> >> followup on the bug report?
> Sometimes it's just needed to do one arch, not all of them.
hm... interesting, haven't thought about that case. Can you give an example?
The only thing I can think of right now is if you do rebuild for a transition
but don't adjust the build-dependency to require at least the transitioned
version. This however is bad for derivatives and gave me a hard time figuring
the correct order for earlier haskell transitions (which is now thankfully
fixed in debian :)).
> If your concerned about abuse,
> maybe it could be restricted to core-dev or the release teams.
Actually my concern is not about abuse, but rather about quality. (and I
didn't even mention testing the transitioned package in my previous mail).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20080805/f76b6195/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel