daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com
Wed Sep 26 11:02:55 BST 2007
Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2007, 12:17 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> OK. I think that means you believe our document should be all inclusive, but
> have references to equivalent Debian docs. Is that correct?
At first I think we should aggregate all packaging information we have
at the moment. Then aim for having a guide that makes it as easy as
possible to follow it and directly start contributing.
I can think of a lot of abstracts that are best 1) quickly summarised
and 2) linked to in the Debian docs.
I'm not sure this answers your question regarding 'all inclusive'-ness -
at least I hope it clarifies what I'd envision.
Have a nice day,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20070926/531d6752/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel