Future of the Packaging Guide

[Daniel Holbach]

Am Samstag, den 22.09.2007, 10:48 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> that, and users asking questions directly on pages containing
> controversial content [1], which are left unanswered for a long time. I
> think this is a real problem, because the document itself looses
> authority this way.

As I proposed in the thread, I think we can address the problem by
tagging pages or abstracts of pages and have regular Doc Days or reviews
of them on ubuntu-motu-mentors at .


> Anyway, I think especially in the packaging guide, we'll potentially get
> quite some controversial topic, since there are over 1000 Debian
> Maintainers out there, most of them packaging software in subtle
> different ways. If all was in a wiki like proposed, I see a big problem
> for the quality of the document.

SVN and/or bzr results in less contributors. Do you think that or a more
rigorous access control to the documentation is going to help with the
problem of - granted - confusion over diverse packaging techniques?

Have a nice day,
 Daniel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20070924/36fd92c4/attachment.pgp