Freetype changes

[Scott James Remnant]

On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 18:23 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:20:31PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> 
> > We have the same problem at whatever point in the cycle we revert, if we
> > have to.
> 
> No. If it's present in beta, people will assume it's going to be present 
> in final - we've seen that in the past. It's less of an issue if it 
> appears in an alpha and then gets dropped, and getting it in earlier 
> also reduces the probability of us having to drop it.
> 
We've seen with the Compiz decision that the problem of dropping it
equally applies to Alphas

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott at ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20070920/59105482/attachment.pgp