Freetype changes

Scott James Remnant scott at
Thu Sep 20 17:55:44 BST 2007

On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 17:42 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> Anyway. I agree with Scott that this change does provide benefits for 
> many use cases, and I think we should look into it further. However, I'd 
> rather do that at the beginning of a development cycle where we have 
> enough time to fine-tune it properly - doing it at beta time is only 
> really going to give us the options of shipping it as-is or reverting it 
> entirely, and the general userbase is going to be unhappy if we revert 
> it between beta and release. I'd prefer to defer it until we have the 
> confidence that we can get it into a more workable state.
I maintain my argument that Beta time is the best time to trial visual
changes like this, since it's the first release which gets wide-spread

Scott James Remnant
scott at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : 

More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list