should people.ubuntu.com be people.canonical.com

[Matthew East]

Hi,

On 17/09/2007, Jordan Mantha <mantha at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> So one of my pet peeves in the community since I first started has
> been that people.ubuntu.com accounts are only for Canonical employees
> (as far as I'm aware). Since a large majority of Ubuntu developers are
> volunteers and not Canonical employees it seems quite odd and
> exclusionary to have a URL like people.ubuntu.com only for the
> employees.

I agree. Thanks for raising this, I definitely think we should clarify
it. As for which solution is adopted, that doesn't depend on us, it's
a decision for Canonical. For me either would work.

-- 
Matthew East
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF