Launchpad bug statuses
Matt Zimmerman
mdz at ubuntu.com
Wed Oct 3 13:19:00 BST 2007
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:51:48PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 October 2007 14:04, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> > I've written a piece at
> >
> > http://news.launchpad.net/general/of-bugs-and-statuses
> >
> > that describes the intended semantics and existing behaviour for
> > Launchpad bugs. I'd love to hear your questions and comments about cases
> > which we don't handle well so we can better improve the way the tool
> > works.
>
> I find it odd that you include a comittment to fix in the Triaged definition.
> Before reading your posting, I would have thought the distinction between
> Confirmed and Triaged was if it had been root caused.
>
> If commitment to fix is included in Triaged, then I think Ubuntu needs to
> consider further restricting it. I'm certainly going to go back an push any
> bugs I marked Triaged back to Confirmed if I don't intend to fix them.
There should be no implication of a commitment to fix in the Triaged status.
--
- mdz
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list