What is the most ignored bug?

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 20/11/07 at 16:54 +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 16:56 +0100, Alexandre Strube wrote:
> 
> > I vote for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/38442
> > , however may be others...
> > 
> You would need to justify your criteria and define "ignored".
> 
> That bug has many, many replies and status changes -- it fails any
> reasonable definition of "ignored".  It's simply "unfixed".
> 
> The most unfixed bug is simply the open one with the lowest number:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1
> 
> For a reasonable definition of ignored, the bug would have had to have
> been filed on a maintained package and yet received no status updates
> and no comments from anyone other than those affected by the bug.

What's your definition of "maintained package"? Which packages in Ubuntu
are not "maintained"?
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20071120/4df8a750/attachment.pgp