Using tags to describe distribution patches, call for comments

[Ted Gould]

On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 15:22 +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> A first list of suggested tags to use:
> 
> * Ubuntu: launchpad_uri

Perhaps we could use a shorthand here like "lp:1234" instead of the full
Launchpad URI?

> The corresponding Ubuntu bug number
> 
> * Upstream: upstream_uri

Does having this imply that it has been submitted upstream?  Should we
have a tag for that?  I was thinking that if we make it an explicit tag
perhaps we could ask the launchpad guys to add a bug if a package has it
set to false.  That way in the flurry of a release patches could be
added, but they'd still be tracked.

		--Ted

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20071119/37998338/attachment-0001.pgp