Bug workflow - a wider view

[Stephan Hermann]

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2007, 19:25 +0100 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> Christian Robottom Reis writes ("Re: Bug workflow - a wider view"):
> > One of the top issues we discussed at last week's Launchpad planning
> > sprint was how to do better forwarding of bugs upstream. This covered a
> > number of areas:
> 
> >  [ generally, manipulating upstream bug systems via launchpad ]
> 
> I am quite worried.
> 
> LP should not permit itself to be used to file a bug upstream unless
> the owners of the upstream bug system have agreed.

This is not only valid for Debian but for most of the upstream projects
I was involved during my Ubuntu time. Most of them don't like
automagically forwarded bug reports.

They do like bugreports, reported by humans, not by robots.

REgards,

\sh

-- 
Stephan Hermann
eMail: sh at sourcecode.de         Blog: http://linux.blogweb.de/
JID: sh at linux-server.org        
OSS-Developer and Admin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20070709/b39d8a80/attachment.pgp