Accepted apport 0.60 (source)

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:48:36AM +0900, Trent Lloyd wrote:
> Howdy,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:40:45PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:05:16PM -0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > >    * apport/packaging.py: Add get_architecture() interface for determining the
> > >      architecture of a particular package (which might not match the overall
> > >      system architecture on multiarch-capable systems, e. g. an i386 Firefox
> > >      package installed on amd64).
> > 
> > Given that we don't support such configurations at present, is it possible
> > to make this information prominent in the bug report description?  It should
> > be immediately obvious if there is a mismatch between the system
> > architecture and the package architecture.
> 
> Aren't there a few 32bit packages, i know openoffice was at one point (i
> think that changed now?) and there was talk of a 32bit firefox?

It used to be the case that 32-bit binaries were used for OpenOffice.org on
Ubuntu/amd64 (packaged in amd64 packages), but that isn't what we're talking
about here.  We're talking about the case where the package's advertised
architecture doesn't match that of the system.

-- 
 - mdz