Accepted apport 0.60 (source)
mdz at ubuntu.com
Mon Feb 26 23:56:10 GMT 2007
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:48:36AM +0900, Trent Lloyd wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:40:45PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:05:16PM -0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > * apport/packaging.py: Add get_architecture() interface for determining the
> > > architecture of a particular package (which might not match the overall
> > > system architecture on multiarch-capable systems, e. g. an i386 Firefox
> > > package installed on amd64).
> > Given that we don't support such configurations at present, is it possible
> > to make this information prominent in the bug report description? It should
> > be immediately obvious if there is a mismatch between the system
> > architecture and the package architecture.
> Aren't there a few 32bit packages, i know openoffice was at one point (i
> think that changed now?) and there was talk of a 32bit firefox?
It used to be the case that 32-bit binaries were used for OpenOffice.org on
Ubuntu/amd64 (packaged in amd64 packages), but that isn't what we're talking
about here. We're talking about the case where the package's advertised
architecture doesn't match that of the system.
More information about the ubuntu-devel