nspluginwrapper package

Scott Dier dieman at ringworld.org
Sat Sep 30 22:54:22 BST 2006


My 'hack' involved compiling part of it on a 32 bit machine, and part of 
it on a 64 bit machine.  I was unable to compile the 32 bit required 
parts on a 64 bit machine.

I think you could do 2 source packages and have the 2nd package targeted 
at amd64 pull in the 32bit parts and make them part of the 64 bit 
package much like ia32-libs.  But thats not how I did it.

Thanks,

Ahmed El-Mahmoudy wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:18:38AM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
>> I'm sorry I haven't emailed out about this but I had worked up a package 
>> of my own last week (sorry, its been busy with school having started 
>> this month) and it stopped working a bit and crashed firefox once or 
>> twice within an hour.  It worked *well* when it did work, but sometimes 
>> it would just stop inserting itself as a plugin after showing a few 
>> different flash sites.  Also, it doesn't look like a flash plugin to 
>> noscript, so that sort of sucks, too. :)
>>
>> I'm guessing a few more months of development will make nspluginwrapper 
>> usable if its being actively worked on, but I don't have the resources 
>> during my workday to hack on it in the near future.
> Matt Zimmerman has suggested in the "How long will 64bit Ubuntu users 
> have to wait?" thread that ndiswrapper would be uploaded to 
> universe even though it is buggy. As I understand the reason is that so 
> that more people would be involved in solving those problems.
> 
> I suggest that you upload your package to REVU since mine fails to 
> compile on amd64.
> Thanks...
> 


-- 
Scott Dier <dieman at ringworld.org>



More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list