Why OpenOfficeupgrade held back
Toby Smithe
toby.smithe at gmail.com
Sun Sep 24 07:47:30 BST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Collins Richey wrote:
> On 9/23/06, Daniel Robitaille <robitaille at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2006-23-09 at 17:45 -0600, Collins Richey wrote:
>>> Not likely anyone but developers would know the answer.
>>>
>>> Why are the latest OpenOffice upgrades held back,ie I presume must be
>>> installed via dist-upgrade?
>> do "sudo apt-get dist-upgrade", and look at which new packages it wants
>> to install for you. Then you will have your answer and you can decide
>> if you want to do the actual install or not on your system.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ubuntu-devel mailing list
>> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>>
> On 9/23/06, Daniel Robitaille <robitaille at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2006-23-09 at 17:45 -0600, Collins Richey wrote:
>>> Not likely anyone but developers would know the answer.
>>>
>>> Why are the latest OpenOffice upgrades held back,ie I presume must be
>>> installed via dist-upgrade?
>> do "sudo apt-get dist-upgrade", and look at which new packages it wants
>> to install for you. Then you will have your answer and you can decide
>> if you want to do the actual install or not on your system.
>>
>
> Rather interesting results. If I do an apt-get dist-upgrade (I always
> run from sudo su -), I get a number of extra packages to be installed
> and a number of packages to be removed. If, OTOH,
> I do apt-get install openoffice.org, I get larger numbers of packages
> to be removed and a gigantic list of packages (most seemingly
> unrelated) to be obsoleted.
>
I get this as well. However, I doesn't really concern me, as I run
aptitude. I thought it was a product of that; but if it's not, I would
be worried.
> So, the additional questions are
>
> 1. Has anyone developer or otherwise actually tested this packaging?
There was an unofficial repo with the packages in for testing. I used
them, and they were fine there.
> 2. Will this package break my system?
Don't run apt-get auto-remove (or whatever the command is) and you
should be alright. I do recommend running aptitude though; it has better
reverse dependency management.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFFioCv7fgPJvITk4RAktYAKC/pGJjVAtQDct5VoO4wHTBgsbOmQCdHv2x
NNsmfX/Wp/gUqlqjGlbC+p8=
=f3tK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list