mathusalem into 7.04
john.stowers.lists at gmail.com
Mon Oct 23 09:20:33 BST 2006
> I don't know enough about the details of how much is likely to change
> - so I won't givve an opinion either way, but I will point out that a
> recent discussion on gnome-dekstop-devel stated that having modules
> included in a distro was a precursor to their inlusion in Gnome,
> rather than the other way around...
> I think someone clarified this more formally but I can't find it :S
> Basically - we shouldn't stop just because it isn't in Gnome yet
True, but that post was more from the perspective of quality, if
application X is of sufficient quality to sit in distro Y for n
releases then we should consider it for GNOME.
Unfortunately, in the case of muthusalem (and by the authors own
admission) this is not yet the case.
More information about the ubuntu-devel