mathusalem into 7.04

Arwyn Hainsworth arwynh+ubuntu at gmail.com
Sun Oct 22 15:59:01 BST 2006


On 22/10/06, Ivan Krstić <krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> Christoffer Sørensen wrote:
> > Because he was against it for inclusion in Gnome, does not mean that
> > it cannot be included in Ubuntu.
>
> Did you read Steve's message? He is pointedly *not* against inclusion in
> Gnome; he is against inclusion in Gnome 2.18, as he believes the
> component needs some serious work that he's not able to do on the 2.18
> timeline. Instead, he is likely to propose it for inclusion in 2.20.
>
> It would make little sense for Ubuntu to include code considered
> unsuitable for inclusion by the upstream author. The correct course of
> action is more probably to postpone this for Feisty+1, where it is
> likely to be included in Gnome proper.
>
> I agree, considering Steve's evaluation of the code it would not be a good
idea to include it main prior to its inclusion into GNOME. That said, a
Universe package for Feisty would be nice have and would provide a nice beta
test for a 2.20 Gnome inclusion road map.

Arwyn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20061022/adb68ad6/attachment-0002.htm 


More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list