Network Manager and edgy
scott_ubuntu at scott.tranzoa.net
Sat Oct 14 23:49:14 BST 2006
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:14:37AM -0400, t u wrote:
> why not a uvf exception? it is important enough of a package. here's the
> process explanation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Processes/UVF
Someone else would have to do that, like a MOTU or the upstream Debian
developer who posted before.
Basically, there are two proposals on the table from "the community":
1. Accept the debdiff for 0.6.3-2ubuntu6, a < 10 line patch fixing one
of the most reported bugs against the package.
2. UVF in the new version, and drop the broken patches. This would
solve even more bugs against the package.
Both have packages and patches that have been (mostly) ignored by Ubuntu
devs. I'm sick of this "process" and wasted effort, so I'm bowing out
http://quadhome.com/ - Personal webpage
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20061014/49e96242/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel