Is Ubuntu going to adapt Ice Weasel?

[Scott James Remnant]

On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 16:49 -0400, Dmitriy Kropivnitskiy wrote:

> Just to make my position (and I think position of many other people)
> regarding firefox vs. epiphany.
> 
We're not talking about "Firefox vs. Epiphany".

We're talking about "If the Mozilla Corporation tell us that we may not
distribute Firefox, what should we distribute instead?"

One of the options is GNU IceWeasel, another is Ephiphany.

Any "instead of firefox" is irrelevant at this point in the discussion,
if this happens it's because we *cannot* *distribute* *Firefox*.

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott at ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20061012/cfb1fad2/attachment.pgp