Is Ubuntu going to adapt Ice Weasel?

[Toby Smithe]

On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 23:06 +0200, Josué Alcalde González wrote:
> El mié, 11-10-2006 a las 21:52 +0100, Toby Smithe escribió:
> > On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 22:44 +0200, Josué Alcalde González wrote:
> > > El mié, 11-10-2006 a las 18:40 +0100, Toby Smithe escribió:
> > > > On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 10:48 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:52 -0700, Daniel Robitaille wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > This would certainly be my preferred option also.  If we can't ship
> > > > > Firefox under that name in main, I would rather we shipped firefox
> > > > > elsewhere for "people who want it", and then chose a better integrated
> > > > > browser such as Epiphany as our default.
> > > > 
> > > > This is definitely the route I'd prefer to take.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > It would be the route to take if we could ship epiphany without firefox,
> > > but we need firefox or iceweasel installed to install epiphany. 
> > > 
> > 
> > That is not the case. The current Epiphany version builds perfectly
> > again XULRunner since at least 1.8 (the first time I tested it).
> > 
> 
> I didn't know. Why is epiphany-browser built against firefox in edgy?
> 

As everyone has Firefox installed, building against XULRunner would mean
having to pull in an extra set of libs, which is a waste of space. I
guess this is the reason.