Is Ubuntu going to adapt Ice Weasel?
Michael V. De Palatis
depalatis at gmail.com
Sat Oct 7 21:50:23 BST 2006
On 10/7/06, François-Denis Gonthier <neumann at lostwebsite.net> wrote:
> >>>>> "Scott" == Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> writes:
> Scott> Not sure what they should do for Edgy, but in general,
> Scott> maybe put Iceweasel in main and the unmodified FIrefox in
> Scott> commerical?
> Commercial? Why not non-free (aka. multiverse)? I mean, I can admit
> it no longer suits the requirement of Free software, but its still
> redistributable without dealing with the Mozilla Fundation right?
Multiverse is indeed a better option. That would still require that
all upstream patches be submitted to Mozilla Foundation, though
(clearly, using the nonfree logo isn't an issue if it's in multiverse
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
More information about the ubuntu-devel