Is Ubuntu going to adapt Ice Weasel?

Michael V. De Palatis depalatis at
Sat Oct 7 21:50:23 BST 2006

On 10/7/06, François-Denis Gonthier <neumann at> wrote:
> >>>>> "Scott" == Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at> writes:
>     Scott> Not sure what they should do for Edgy, but in general,
>     Scott> maybe put Iceweasel in main and the unmodified FIrefox in
>     Scott> commerical?
> Commercial?  Why not non-free (aka. multiverse)?  I mean, I can admit
> it no longer suits the requirement of Free software, but its still
> redistributable without dealing with the Mozilla Fundation right?

Multiverse is indeed a better option. That would still require that
all upstream patches be submitted to Mozilla Foundation, though
(clearly, using the nonfree logo isn't an issue if it's in multiverse
anyway, though).


> F-D
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at


More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list