hoping for suspend2 support in feisty

[Matthew Garrett]

On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 11:05:45PM -0500, Matt Price wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-28-11 at 03:43 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Which of the use cases support providing suspend2 in our kernel?
> > 
> um, I hope that's not what the spec appears to argue for. 

Sorry, I think I've interpreted "suspend2 support in feisty" as, erm, 
"feisty should support suspend2". This would appear to be incorrect :)

We're not supporting an entirely separate power management framework 
(ie, the hibernate script). Having two ways to do the same thing is 
*not* beneficial when trying to debug power management issues. If 
hibernate makes things work, then it's perfectly reasonable to file a 
bug against our scripts. The chances of suspend2 itself fixing anything 
are pretty miniscule.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org