Evolution and spam

[Dennis Kaarsemaker]

On do, 2006-03-16 at 11:38 +0100, VETSEL Patrice wrote:

> Where are we going with spam filtering in evolution ?

Currently nowhere unfortunately - and dapper is already way past feature
freeze (even if dapper were delayed, feature free would remain intact).
Please write a BetterSpamFiltering spec for dapper+1 with your ideas and
let's hope it will be implemented.

In Dapper I switched from spamassassin to bogofilter but it's not useful
at all since you can't mark messages as non-juk if they are no yet
marked as junk. And thus bogofilter (same goes for spamassassin) cannot
learn good tokens. You have to resort to the command line for this.

I really hope that there will be some improvement for dapper+1, which
only is possible if someone with good ideas about it writes a spec.
-- 
Dennis K.
 - Linux for human beings - http://www.ubuntu.com
 - Linux voor normale mensen - http://www.ubuntu-nl.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060316/5ae84593/attachment.pgp