my experience with testing flight 5, your experiences? and why the delay is essential

[Scott James Remnant]

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 23:12 +0100, Sander van Loon wrote:

> Yes, I know that 1280x1024 is 5:4, but I don't see how it's an
> abomination. 1024 is more pixels than 960, so you have more space on
> your monitor. and it is the resolution which is recommended by the
> producer.
> 
Whoever calls it an abomination has clearly never bothered measuring
their monitor.  Most TFTs are 5:4 aspect ratio, not 4:3.

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott at ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060315/9e8f1ebf/attachment.pgp