my experience with testing flight 5, your experiences? and why the delay is essential

[John Nilsson]

On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:52 -0800, George Farris wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 23:12 +0100, John Nilsson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:21 +0100, Martin Kreiner wrote:
> > >     - calculate a "suitable" default resolutions (e.g. 19'' -> 1280x1024)
> > 
> > 1280x1024 is an abomination. For a normal 19" 4:3 monitor the correct
> > resolution is 1280x960. Maybe the automagic should check the aspect
> > ratio too when calculating modes.
> > 
> > 1280x1024 is 5:4, something that I have never seen in a CRT.
> 
> Except that every standard LCD, CRT and video card on the market does
> standard resolutions: 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768, 1280x1024 and
> 1600x1200.  In fact many LCD's have a natural resolution of 1280x1024
> which translates to the numbers of physical points in the LCD.

Ok, I stand corrected.

Here is the list:
Name	Resolution	Ratio
VGA	640x480		4:3
SVGA	800x600		4:3
XGA	1024x768	4:3
SXGA	1280x1024	5:4 (it's still an abomination...)
UXGA	1600x1200	4:3
WXGA	1366x768	16:9
WSXGA	1680x1050	16:10
WUXGA	1920x1200	16:10


But I did refer to CRT not LCD monitors. Here's mine f.e.
Samsung 957p	352x264mm	4:3

Regards,
John