Gnome Screensaver issues?
maihem at maihem.org
Sun Mar 12 23:17:50 GMT 2006
Oliver Grawert wrote:
> since nearly every app out there uses its own mechanism to make sure the
> screensaver doesnt kick in, you'd have to rewrite xscreensaver ...
> note that every app i touched until now has an implementation for
> xscreensaver and a different one for kscreensaver, gnome-screensaver is
> simply a new implementation that actually needs to be added there, there
> is no global reciepe you can use ...
No, but there are only three commonly used methods. xscreensaver,
kscreensaver, and gnome-screensaver - then god knows how many
applications. The best solution is to choose one of the screensavers
(gnome-screensaver has been chosen), and port some of the code from the
other two, rather than porting the code from, eg, totem to all the other
> please file bugs on apps where you see it, i agree that a general
> solution should be found for all screensavers, but due to the three
> different approaches the screensavers currently take this will require
> some time and some flexibility from upstream (which you wont see for
> xscreensaver) to adopt such a solution.
Does it need to be done upstream? And does it need to be done for
xscreensaver? It is gnome-screensaver that has been chosen, so it's only
that one that needs to be patched.
This change would make gnome-screensaver justifiably technically better
than both xscreensaver and kscreensaver. Then the only argument left for
those that don't like gnome-screensaver will be that of configurability
which is only a policy decision and not one of technical merit. But at
least the technical problems will be solved for Dapper, for the
enterprises that have existing binaries of programs that shouldn't start
the screensaver. Those users will find that Ubuntu just works for them.
More information about the ubuntu-devel