New ZeroConf Spec

[Travis Watkins]

On 7/26/06, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> Let's see, now: you're saying that if we take an
> already somewhat insecure system, and
> add another gaping security hole,
> that it's now more secure?
> - Dan
>

It's a tradeoff: security (doesn't appear to be much of an issue) vs
functionality. Do we want the features avahi gives? That's really what
it comes down to.

-- 
Travis Watkins
http://www.realistanew.com