2c about the development of ubuntu

Udo 'Robos' Puetz robos at muon.de
Tue Jan 3 12:24:40 GMT 2006

On Tue, 03.01.06, Daniel Stone <daniel.stone at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 09:29:46PM +0100, Udo 'Robos' Puetz wrote:
> > I was specifically referring to 2.6.15 since this is already in dapper. A
> > little too early for my taste. And testing should occur with those who
> > compile kernels themselves, not with distros that ship it to their customers.
> > Especially for a server I want a tested kernel, if the tested one can
> > provide for all the hardware I got - naturally. 
> If you want a stable, tested, kernel, why on *earth* are you running a
> rolling development branch?  Stick to releases, surely?

Aaeh, I'm playing devils advocate here. I wouldn't consider myself the
"normal" user I described in the other mail. And I run dapper because I want
to actually help and not only lament :)
I wanted to substantiate this with my list of filed bugs but that doesn't
work somehow. I submitted more than one bug...

> -- 
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Robos - 
gpg --recv-keys --keyserver blackhole.pca.dfn.de 6EEADA09

More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list