Concerns

[Krzysztof Lichota]

Andrew Zajac napisał(a):
> On 12/13/06, Matt Zimmerman <mdz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> 
>>   If your tool makes this process easier, then everyone is
>> happy.  Thanks for your concern.
> 
> What is the consensus about distributing the source code for these
> derivatives?  Since they are tweaked Ubuntu distros, does one comply
> to the GPL by pointing to the Ubuntu archives for the source code?  Or
> do they have to distribute the source code themselves?

Based on Mepis case, it seems derivative distro must provide its own
sources (for packages it distributes).

But I am not a lawyer...

HTH

	Krzysztof Lichota

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20061221/c53c02d1/attachment-0001.pgp