Optimized kernel builds: the straight dope
Hervé Fache
Herve at lucidia.net
Sun Aug 27 14:07:51 BST 2006
Hello all,
Took me too long to find the time! But never mind, here are the results:
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.15-26-386 3 335 97.3 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.6.15-26-k7 3 330 98.2 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.15-26-386 3 326 99.1 0.0 0.0 0.97
2.6.15-26-k7 3 326 99.1 0.0 0.0 0.99
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.15-26-386 3 472 68.9 504.0 30.5 1.41
2.6.15-26-k7 3 467 69.2 444.3 29.6 1.42
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.15-26-386 3 418 79.2 6.3 4.8 1.25
2.6.15-26-k7 3 394 84.0 6.0 4.8 1.19
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.15-26-386 3 622 54.0 14.3 11.6 1.86
2.6.15-26-k7 3 535 62.2 12.3 12.0 1.62
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.15-26-386 3 872 38.2 13126.4 18.8 2.60
2.6.15-26-k7 3 820 40.6 12280.1 19.6 2.48
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.15-26-386 3 1196 28.0 86.9 6.7 3.57
2.6.15-26-k7 3 510 64.9 26.7 4.7 1.55
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.15-26-386 3 429 76.9 1.3 12.6 1.28
2.6.15-26-k7 3 413 79.9 1.0 12.8 1.25
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.15-26-386 3 354 91.8 42.7 0.0 1.06
2.6.15-26-k7 3 340 95.3 42.3 0.0 1.03
As you can see, all similar number apart from the read_load test. We
still seem to benefit from the optimized kernel under load though.
HTH
Hervé.
On 8/15/06, Hervé Fache <Herve at lucidia.net> wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I would like to run this test on my AthlonXP 2800+ box, which is a
> very fast machine. This might bring some interesting results from the
> -k7 side?
>
> Hervé.
>
> On 8/14/06, Matt Zimmerman <mdz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > Enter Ben Collins, our kernel team lead, who has put together a performance
> > test to answer that question, covering both the i386 and amd64
> > architectures.
>
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list