Freedom (Re: Most offensive thing I've seen all day)

[Peter Whittaker]

On Fri, 2006-04-08 at 07:21 +0800, Jerome Gotangco wrote: 
> On 8/4/06, Daniel <crassico at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Only that it wouldn't be so easy if it was Jihadbuntu, with a nice pic of
> > the twin towers colapsing as the default wallpaper. Would it?
> 
> Alas that is the price to pay for freedom, as the freedom to run any
> program, for any purpose is one of the cornerstones of free software.

And that has a lot to do with the "being less excellent to each other"
made by point Michael Mosbey (+1 on that, BTW).

More to the point, would jihadubuntu not be against the code of conduct?
So long as a community respects the code of conduct and makes reasonable
effort to remind its members of the code in its fora, etc. (as members
of ubuntu.com fora and lists do, from time to time), then where is the
offense?

If the community uses the Ubuntu bandwagon to promulgate philosophy that
runs counter to the code (is less excellent to everyone else), that's a
different story.

main() {
	printf("Be excellent to each other\n");
}

(Trying to make this devel- relevant, :->)

pww

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060803/12877a61/attachment-0001.pgp