Ati X700 and Breezy Resolution problem

Lakin Wecker lakin.wecker at gmail.com
Sat Oct 1 20:24:44 CDT 2005


Of course. The very next time that I reboot to test out a small kernel
option change, gdm comes up with no problems.

In terms of helping me fix a problem, feel free to ignore this letter.

But I still wonder if this is a bug that I should report?

Lakin

On 10/1/05, Lakin Wecker <lakin.wecker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I just installed breezy using the breezy preview CD. A full installation
> report fo the laptop testing team will follow, but currently I'm struggling
> with a problem that I haven't been able to solve. I'm installing onto my
> laptop which has an ATI x700 card. Breezy did a better job at detecting
> the hardware than hoary did, but I still had to tweak a few things. I
> upgraded to the latest packages available, then I installed the fglrx Xorg
> and Kernel module. Rebooted to use the appopriate kernel, and loaded the
> fglrx kernel module. I then ran fglrxconfig so that I could swith the
> primary display back to the LCD (Which is a bug report that I'll be filing
> in a few minutes). I edited the fglrxconfig to have the correct resolution
> (1680x1050) specified.
>
> But when I start gdm, it starts with only 1280x1024 resolution, completely
> ignoring the stuff that I have in the xorg.conf. However, if I kill gdm,
> and then just use startx, it uses the appropriate resolution. In fact I've
> scoured the logs at /var/log/Xorg.0.log for any information that might let
> me know what is misconfigured, but I can't find anything that let's me know
> what's wrong.
>
> The thing that surprises me the most is that the detected modes listed in
> the Xorg.log are different when I start gdm as they don't include the
> 1680x1050 resolution, but this is included in the Xorg.log when using
> startx.
>
> These are links to copies of my Xorg logs, first the one produced by GDM
> which isn't working correctly:
> http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~weckerl/Xorg.0.log<http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/%7Eweckerl/Xorg.0.log>
>
> Second, the one produced when I run startx manually:
> http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~weckerl/Xorg.0.log_works<http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/%7Eweckerl/Xorg.0.log_works>
>
>
> Should I file this as a bug or is there a known fix?
>
> Thanks for the help in advance.
>
> Lakin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20051001/4e67194b/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list